Who has burden of proof in an administrative hearing?

Prepare for the New York Law Exam with our practice test. Study with structured flashcards and multiple choice questions. Each question offers hints and explanations to ensure you're ready for your exam success!

Multiple Choice

Who has burden of proof in an administrative hearing?

Explanation:
In administrative hearings, the burden of proof sits with the party who starts the proceeding. That party must show, by a preponderance of the evidence, that their claims are more likely true than not and that they’re entitled to the relief they seek. The agency and its witnesses present evidence to respond, but the initial responsibility to prove the case lies with the petitioner. The presiding officer’s role is to apply the rules of evidence and judge the merits of the evidence presented, not to prove the facts themselves. The public is not a party with a burden of proof in ordinary administrative adjudications. While some statutes can shift burdens in specific contexts, the typical framework places the burden on the initiating party to establish entitlement.

In administrative hearings, the burden of proof sits with the party who starts the proceeding. That party must show, by a preponderance of the evidence, that their claims are more likely true than not and that they’re entitled to the relief they seek. The agency and its witnesses present evidence to respond, but the initial responsibility to prove the case lies with the petitioner. The presiding officer’s role is to apply the rules of evidence and judge the merits of the evidence presented, not to prove the facts themselves. The public is not a party with a burden of proof in ordinary administrative adjudications. While some statutes can shift burdens in specific contexts, the typical framework places the burden on the initiating party to establish entitlement.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy